To be more specific, problem occurs only in very specific circumstances. It's in situation, when application is compiled as console-app and it's compiled on Mac OS X version older than 10.9. Inner path in library is only filename without full path, so when we link library with our executable, our executable also has only relative path. And when macdeployqt try to find this library, automatically try to search in /usr/lib. One possible solution is copy libraries to /usr/lib.
- Now, click on the Edit menu (or the VisTrails menu on Mac OS X), select the Preferences option and select the Module Packages tab. A dialog similar to what is shown in Figure All available packages. Select the pythonCalc package, then click on Enable. This should move the package to the Enabled packages list. Close the dialog.
- The maximum version of Mac OS X, OS X, or macOS supported by each G3 and later Mac follows. For complete specs on a particular system, click the name of the Mac. For all Macs that are compatible with a specifc maximum supported version of Mac OS X - courtesy of EveryMac.com's Ultimate Mac Sort - click the OS of interest.
I want to revisit Tuesday's discussion of clipping; when I wrote that post I was laboring under certain misconceptions related to Core Graphics paths, which I would like to discuss. As a consequence of correcting these misconceptions, I can see that Core Graphics clipping is much easier to work with than I had supposed.
Whoops
My basic mistake was to assume that a Core Graphics path was, essentially, a single closed loop. In fact, a path is a collection of line segments and loops; it is essentially a collection of subpaths, where a subpath corresponds to my original conception of an overall path.
In particular, I misunderstood the purpose of these functions: The bar: episode 0- a vampire in brookshyre.(prototype) mac os.
I thought that CGContextBeginPath and CGContextClosePath formed a pair, and that a path was defined by Core Graphics calls made between these bookends. In fact, CGContextMoveToPoint and CGContextClosePath form the pair; CGContextMoveToPoint establishes the first point on a subpath to which CGContextClosePath will connect, if it is called.
Once this misapprehension was corrected, some other issues related to clipping became clear.
Winding vs. Non-Zero
I had been puzzled by this language in the Core Graphics documentation for CGContextClip:
The function uses the nonzero winding number rule to calculate the intersection of the current path with the current clipping path. Quartz then uses the path resulting from the intersection as the new current clipping path for subsequent painting operations.
and CGContextEOClip:
The function uses the even-odd rule to calculate the intersection of the current path with the current clipping path. Quartz then uses the path resulting from the intersection as the new current clipping path for subsequent painting operations.
When I was working on clipping to hollow shapes, I first tried this procedure:
- Define the 'outer' hull
- Invoke
CGContext*Clip - Define the 'inner' hull
- Invoke
CGContext*Clip
However, no matter which CGContext*Clip functions I called at which point, and no matter which winding I used when defining the hulls, I could not get the clipping paths to interact in the way I wanted. I now understand why: These functions effectively apply the 'nonzero winding' or 'even-odd' rule to the current path (i.e. collection of subpaths), and then take the intersection of the resulting clipping region with the current clipping region.
(Incidentally, the difference between the 'nonzero winding' and 'even-odd' rules is reasonably well explained here; it's not Apple documentation, but it's on-point.)
Examples
This function defines a relatively complex clipping region, used to create the image at the top of this post:
Three points:
- This example was hacked together, so some of the arguments to the function don't make much sense
- The documentation for
CGContextAddArcstates that the final argument (clockwise) must be 1 on the iPhone to create a CCW arc; this does not appear to be true, although I may be misinterpreting my results - The
CGContextMoveToPoint()spreceding the arcs are crucial; without them, Core Graphics will insert line segments between the last point of one arc and the first point of another, with undesirable results
With our new understanding of paths and clipping, we can simplify the code that we saw on Tuesday:
I want to revisit Tuesday's discussion of clipping; when I wrote that post I was laboring under certain misconceptions related to Core Graphics paths, which I would like to discuss. As a consequence of correcting these misconceptions, I can see that Core Graphics clipping is much easier to work with than I had supposed.
Whoops
Inner Path Mac Os Downloads
My basic mistake was to assume that a Core Graphics path was, essentially, a single closed loop. In fact, a path is a collection of line segments and loops; it is essentially a collection of subpaths, where a subpath corresponds to my original conception of an overall path.
In particular, I misunderstood the purpose of these functions: Cryptus mac os.
I thought that CGContextBeginPath and CGContextClosePath formed a pair, and that a path was defined by Core Graphics calls made between these bookends. In fact, CGContextMoveToPoint and CGContextClosePath form the pair; CGContextMoveToPoint establishes the first point on a subpath to which CGContextClosePath will connect, if it is called.
Once this misapprehension was corrected, some other issues related to clipping became clear.
Winding vs. Non-Zero
(Incidentally, the difference between the 'nonzero winding' and 'even-odd' rules is reasonably well explained here; it's not Apple documentation, but it's on-point.)
Examples
This function defines a relatively complex clipping region, used to create the image at the top of this post:
Three points:
- This example was hacked together, so some of the arguments to the function don't make much sense
- The documentation for
CGContextAddArcstates that the final argument (clockwise) must be 1 on the iPhone to create a CCW arc; this does not appear to be true, although I may be misinterpreting my results - The
CGContextMoveToPoint()spreceding the arcs are crucial; without them, Core Graphics will insert line segments between the last point of one arc and the first point of another, with undesirable results
With our new understanding of paths and clipping, we can simplify the code that we saw on Tuesday:
I want to revisit Tuesday's discussion of clipping; when I wrote that post I was laboring under certain misconceptions related to Core Graphics paths, which I would like to discuss. As a consequence of correcting these misconceptions, I can see that Core Graphics clipping is much easier to work with than I had supposed.
Whoops
Inner Path Mac Os Downloads
My basic mistake was to assume that a Core Graphics path was, essentially, a single closed loop. In fact, a path is a collection of line segments and loops; it is essentially a collection of subpaths, where a subpath corresponds to my original conception of an overall path.
In particular, I misunderstood the purpose of these functions: Cryptus mac os.
I thought that CGContextBeginPath and CGContextClosePath formed a pair, and that a path was defined by Core Graphics calls made between these bookends. In fact, CGContextMoveToPoint and CGContextClosePath form the pair; CGContextMoveToPoint establishes the first point on a subpath to which CGContextClosePath will connect, if it is called.
Once this misapprehension was corrected, some other issues related to clipping became clear.
Winding vs. Non-Zero
I had been puzzled by this language in the Core Graphics documentation for CGContextClip:
The function uses the nonzero winding number rule to calculate the intersection of the current path with the current clipping path. Quartz then uses the path resulting from the intersection as the new current clipping path for subsequent painting operations.
and CGContextEOClip:
The function uses the even-odd rule to calculate the intersection of the current path with the current clipping path. Quartz then uses the path resulting from the intersection as the new current clipping path for subsequent painting operations.
When I was working on clipping to hollow shapes, I first tried this procedure:
- Define the 'outer' hull
- Invoke
CGContext*Clip - Define the 'inner' hull
- Invoke
CGContext*Clip
However, no matter which CGContext*Clip functions I called at which point, and no matter which winding I used when defining the hulls, I could not get the clipping paths to interact in the way I wanted. I now understand why: These functions effectively apply the 'nonzero winding' or 'even-odd' rule to the current path (i.e. collection of subpaths), and then take the intersection of the resulting clipping region with the current clipping region.
(Incidentally, the difference between the 'nonzero winding' and 'even-odd' rules is reasonably well explained here; it's not Apple documentation, but it's on-point.)
Inner Path Mac Os Catalina
Examples
This function defines a relatively complex clipping region, used to create the image at the top of this post:
Pokemon battle mac os. Three points:
- This example was hacked together, so some of the arguments to the function don't make much sense
- The documentation for
CGContextAddArcstates that the final argument (clockwise) must be 1 on the iPhone to create a CCW arc; this does not appear to be true, although I may be misinterpreting my results - The
CGContextMoveToPoint()spreceding the arcs are crucial; without them, Core Graphics will insert line segments between the last point of one arc and the first point of another, with undesirable results
With our new understanding of paths and clipping, we can simplify the code that we saw on Tuesday:
